State v. Olson, Minn.Ct.App., 12/5/2016. An officer ticketed Mr. Olson for speeding, based upon the officer's use of a handheld laser device. Mr. Olson challenged the foundational reliability of the laser device; he said that Minn.Stat. 169.14, subd. 10(a)(4) allows an officer to testify about a reading from a "speed-testing device" only if the officer first establishes that he performed an external test to verify that the device was functioning reliably. Because the officer had only - and half-assed at that according to Mr. Olson - tested the laser's distance measurement the statute's requirements hadn't been met. That's because speed is a measurement of both distance and time, and the officer performed no tests to determine that the laser was accurately measuring time. Instead, the officer limited his testing to measuring a known distance to a stationary object.
Whew.
The court of appeals said that Mr. Olson didn't understand just how a laser works. The court said that the laser measures distance "specifically based on the constant speed of light and based on the time it takes for a pulsed, infrared light to reflect off the target and return to the device. If the laser gets a known distance right then necessarily it have got the time right as well.
No comments:
Post a Comment