The state took a pretrial
appeal of an order granting Mr. Yarbrough’s motion to suppress evidence
seized during the execution of a search warrant at Mr. Yarbrough’s
residence. The warrant sought both drugs and a gun. The search warrant
affidavit alleged that three days earlier Mr. Yarbrough had been
involved “in a terroristic threats situation” during which he accused
the victim of the threats of stealing “a large amount” of crack cocaine
from him, during which he punched the victim, during which he
“brandished” a .22 caliber handgun, and after which he then fled in a
maroon Chevy Caprice. The affidavit went on to say that the Caprice
registered to the address sought to be searched, that police data bases
established that Mr. Yarbrough lived at that address, that Mr. Yarbrough
had been arrested three months earlier for possession of narcotics, and
that a snitch “knew "[Mr. Yarbrough] to deal in crack cocaine.”
Showing posts with label PFR. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PFR. Show all posts
Friday, July 5, 2013
7/3/13: No New Criminal Opinions Today; Review Granted in Search Warrant Case
7/3/2013: The Court granted review in one case, State v. Yarbrough. Here's the opening description:
Wednesday, June 26, 2013
Supreme Court Accepts Review in State v. Lemert
The supreme court has accepted review of this court of appeals opinion, wherein the court of appeals said that the “right to frisk” can derive from the “right to stop” so long as the quantity of drugs is “large.” Read about the court of appeals opinion here.
Thursday, February 7, 2013
2/6/2013: No Published Supreme Court Criminal Opinions
However, the court did grant review in a number of cases, including these two:
State v. Wenthe, about which I wrote here. The court of appeals reversed Mr. Wenthe's conviction. The state sought review of that reversal and the defense sought review on the facial constitutionality (Establishment Clause) of Minn.Stat. 609.344, subd. 1(1).
State v. Juarez, review granted of an unpublished opinion of the court of appeals, available here. The issue is the constitutionality of life without possibility of release for certain repeat sex offenders under Minn.Stat. 609.3455, subd. 2(a)(2).
State v. Wenthe, about which I wrote here. The court of appeals reversed Mr. Wenthe's conviction. The state sought review of that reversal and the defense sought review on the facial constitutionality (Establishment Clause) of Minn.Stat. 609.344, subd. 1(1).
State v. Juarez, review granted of an unpublished opinion of the court of appeals, available here. The issue is the constitutionality of life without possibility of release for certain repeat sex offenders under Minn.Stat. 609.3455, subd. 2(a)(2).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)